The Oxford Comma: A Battleground for the Ages (Especially Between Recruiters and Gen Z)

Brace yourselves, fellow recruiters, for a linguistic showdown: the Oxford Comma.

You know the drill: that pesky comma before the "and" in a list ("red, white, and blue"). Some swear by it, claiming it prevents ambiguity. Others deem it superfluous, a grammatical speed bump on the highway of communication.

And enter Gen Z, the digital natives, armed with emojis and a disdain for all things "old-fashioned." For them, the Oxford Comma is a relic of a bygone era, a grammatical dinosaur lumbering through the 21st century. They see it as unnecessary, even pretentious.

So, what's a recruiter to do?

• Embrace the ambiguity (sometimes): Let's face it, in many cases, the meaning is clear without the Oxford Comma.

• Know your audience: If you're communicating with a younger audience (like many of your candidates), consider omitting the Oxford Comma to avoid unnecessary friction.

• Consistency is key: Whatever your preference, maintain consistency throughout your communication.

  
  

The Bottom Line:

The Oxford Comma debate may never be fully resolved. But as recruiters, it's crucial to be aware of these generational differences and adapt our communication accordingly. After all, who wants to alienate potential candidates with a misplaced comma?

P.S. We're still waiting for the period to make a triumphant comeback.

Disclaimer: This blog post is intended to be humorous and satirical. It's important to remember that communication styles vary greatly among individuals, and generalisations about entire generations can be misleading.

P.S Some random keywords to help my SEO, so I don't have to pay for Facebook ads:

• Oxford Comma

• grammar

• workplace communication

• recruitment trends

• candidate experience

• communication styles

• generational differences

• workplace culture

• hiring trends